The hidden self

Abstract

“The great field for new discoveries,” said a scientific friend to me the other day, “is always the Unclassified Residuum.” Round about the accredited and orderly facts of every science there ever floats a sort of dust-cloud of exceptional observations, of occurrences minute and irregular, and seldom met with, which it always proves less easy to attend to than to ignore. The ideal of every science is that of a closed and completed system of truth. The charm of most sciences to their more passive disciples consists in their appearing, in fact, to wear just this ideal form. Each one of our various ologies seems to offer a definite head of classification for every possible phenomenon of the sort which it professes to cover; and, so far from free is most men’s fancy, that when a consistent and organized scheme of this sort has once been comprehended and assimilated, a different scheme is unimaginable. No alternative, whether to whole or parts, can any longer be conceived as possible. Phenomena unclassifiable within the system are therefore paradoxical absurdities, and must be held untrue. When, moreover, as so often happens, the reports of them are vague and indirect, when they come as mere marvels and oddities rather than as things of serious moment, one neglects or denies them with the best of scientific consciences. Only the born geniuses let themselves be worried and fascinated by these outstanding exceptions, and get no peace till they are brought within the fold. Your Galileos, Galvanis, Fresnels, Purkinjes, and Darwins are always getting confounded and troubled by insignificant things. Anyone will renovate his science who will steadily look after the irregular phenomena. And when the science is renewed, its new formulas often have more of the voice of the exceptions in them than of what were supposed to be the rules.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Aspects of modern logic.Evert Willem Beth - 1970 - Dordrecht,: Reidel.
The morality of scientific openness.Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.
Levels of research in the biological sciences.Orville T. Bailey - 1945 - Philosophy of Science 12 (1):1-7.
Science and value: Science and value.L. J. Russell - 1930 - Philosophy 5 (18):257-265.
Science and Value.L. J. Russell - 1930 - Philosophy 5 (18):257-.
McTaggart’s Logical Determinism.Nicholas Rescher - 1982 - Idealistic Studies 12 (3):231-241.
Is a science of ethics possible.Robert S. Hartman - 1950 - Philosophy of Science 17 (3):238-246.
Possibilities of Grieving.Mikel Burley - 2015 - Philosophy and Literature 39 (1):154-171.
"Sachverhalt" and "Gegenstand" Are Dead.E. F. Thompkins - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (256):217 - 234.
Sachverhalt and Gegenstand are Dead.E. F. Thompkins - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (256):217-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
241 (#109,533)

6 months
18 (#165,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references