Abstract

Early literacy development is essential for academic success, and selecting practical teaching approaches is crucial in enhancing reading skills among young learners. This research focuses on how sensible the Claveria and Marungko approaches are to the reading performance of Grade 1 pupils in an elementary school in Puerto Princesa City, relating it to their reading challenges. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational and comparative research design, the study assesses reading performance across a sample of 200 Grade 1 pupils selected through simple random sampling and measures outcomes through structured questionnaires and statistical analyses. Findings indicate that while both approaches contribute to improved reading levels, the Claveria Approach identifies more pupils requiring instructional support, with key challenges centered on word recognition and comprehension. Significant correlations emerged between demographic factors and reading outcomes, with females, pupils with fewer siblings, and those with earlier birth orders showing higher reading performance. Additionally, a positive correlation was found between interest in reading and performance. At the same time, health issues and family problems showed negative associations with reading success, underscoring the need for holistic, supportive interventions in early literacy programs.