Dead questions and vicarious understandings: Questioning Gadamer's genealogy

Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):63-78 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gadamer's Truth and Method emphasises the priority of engagement with questions in the process of interpretation; however, there are passages which appear dismissive of concerns with 'dead' scientific and philosophical questions. Here I argue that Gadamer's work is nevertheless an important resource for the historical study of the genesis and dissolution of questions. This type of study can overcome the divide between internal history of contents and external history of contexts. In both philosophy and the sciences, reflection on the genealogy of questions is, I suggest, crucial for our critical awareness of current methods and agendas.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#415,622)

6 months
8 (#521,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Jardine
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Replik.Jürgen Habermas - 1995 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 49 (194):551-565.

Add more references