Reply to professor Horowitz

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (63):241-242 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to professor Horowitz.I. C. Jarvie - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (63):241-242.
On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):147-149.
Reply to professor grünbaum.H. A. C. Dobbs - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):275-278.
A reply to professor Bondi.R. O. Kapp - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (23):241-243.
Reply to professor Puccetti.J. W. N. Watkins - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (49):53-54.
A reply to professor Haldane.J. H. Woodger - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (26):149-155.
Reply to professor born.G. H. Keswani - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (46):151-153.
Reply to professor grünbaum.Herbert Dingle - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (42):145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
15 (#1,222,397)

6 months
8 (#546,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Origin and concept of relativity (III).G. H. Keswani - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):273-294.

Add more references