The Sure Thing Principle

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:719 - 730 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Sure Thing Principle (1), Dominance Principle (2), and Strong Independence Axiom (3) have been attacked and defended in various ways over the past 30 years. In the course of a survey of some of that literature, it is argued that these principles are acceptable iff suitably qualified.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Sure-Thing Principle.Jean Baccelli & Lorenz Hartmann - 2023 - Journal of Mathematical Economics 109 (102915).
The Sure-thing Principle and P2.Yang Liu - 2017 - Economics Letters 159:221-223.
Rationality and the sure-thing principle.Alastair Norcross - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):324 – 327.
Costs of abandoning the Sure-Thing Principle.Rachael Briggs - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5):827-840.
Biting the Bayesian bullet: Zeckhauser's problem.Richard Jeffrey - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):117-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
90 (#234,183)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Counterfactual Desirability.Richard Bradley & H. Orii Stefansson - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2):485-533.
The Sure-Thing Principle.Jean Baccelli & Lorenz Hartmann - 2023 - Journal of Mathematical Economics 109 (102915).

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references