Bodies, Border, Technology

In George E. Lewis & Benjamin Piekut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies, Volume 2. Oxford University Press USA (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter considers the ways in which distance can be accounted for and utilized in improvisational practices. It rejects the notion that proximal bodies in space are a necessary condition for productive improvisation. The chapter reflects on a number of early and recent experiments with telematic performance to locate ways in which distance and difference become important elements in the work to be brought forward rather than rendered invisible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saving Improvisation.Dana Gooley - 2016 - In George E. Lewis & Benjamin Piekut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies, Volume 2. Oxford University Press USA.
Improvisation in Contemporary Experimental Poetry.Hazel Smith - 2016 - In George E. Lewis & Benjamin Piekut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies, Volume 2. Oxford University Press USA.
Improvisation in Freestyle Rap.Ellie M. Hisama - 2016 - In George E. Lewis & Benjamin Piekut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies, Volume 2. Oxford University Press USA.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-24

Downloads
6 (#1,693,354)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references