Paracelsus's Two-Way Astrology: II. Man's Relation to the Stars

British Journal for the History of Science 2 (2):148-155 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The preceding paper described how all-pervasive was the influence that Paracelsus designated ‘astral’. In what sense, then, is it true that he placed restrictions, on astrological powers? The restriction applies to the more limited and usual sense of astrology, referring to the control of events on earth by the stars in the sky. Paracelsus was not prepared to hand over our fates entirely to a distant autocracy of the stars quite beyond our control

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paracelsus's Two-Way Astrology I. What Paracelsus Meant by ‘Stars’.F. R. Jevons - 1964 - British Journal for the History of Science 2 (2):139-147.
The Stars Down to Earth: The Los Angeles Times Astrology Column.Theodor W. Adorno - 1974 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1974 (19):13-90.
The astrological roots of mesmerism.Simon Schaffer - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2):158-168.
Stars, spirits, signs: towards a history of astrology 1100–1800.Lauren Kassell - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2):67-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
44 (#507,867)

6 months
12 (#302,973)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations