- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
One principle and a fourth fallacy of disability studies
Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):204-204 (2002)
Abstract
This brief paper shows that the idea of benefits to the subject compensating for the harms of disability is at best self defeating and at worst sinister. Equally benefits to third parties while real are dubious as compensating factors. This shows that disabilities are just that, a net loss and not a net gainAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
One principle and three fallacies of disability studies.T. Koch - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):203-203.
Beyond the Medical Model? Disability, Formal Justice, and the Exception for the "Profoundly Impaired".Sara Goering - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):373-388.
Minority Minds: Mental Disability and the Presumption of Value Neutrality.Matilda Carter - 2023 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 40 (2):358-375.
Human Rights, Civil Rights: Prescribing Disability Discrimination Prevention in Packaging Essential Health Benefits.Anita Silvers & Leslie Francis - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (4):781-791.
Is Disability a Neutral Condition?Jeffrey M. Brown - 2016 - Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2):188-210.
What Are Parents For?: Reproductive Ethics after the Nonidentity Problem.Bernard G. Prusak - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (2):37-47.
The Arab Spring Protests and Concurrent Disability Protests: Social Movement Spillover or Spurious Relationship?Sharon N. Barnartt - 2014 - Studies in Social Justice 8 (1):67-78.
Offering more without offering compensation: non-compensating benefits for living kidney donors.Kyle Fruh & Ege K. Duman - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (4):711-719.
Disability as a Cultural Problem.Johnathan Flowers - 2021 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 5 (4):39-61.
Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?J. Malek - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):217-221.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
35 (#678,037)
6 months
9 (#328,796)
2010-08-24
Downloads
35 (#678,037)
6 months
9 (#328,796)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Bioethics as ideology: Conditional and unconditional values.Tom Koch - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):251 – 267.
Fear of a female planet: how John Harris came to endorse eugenic social engineering.Robert Sparrow - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):4-7.
Looking for the Meaning of Dignity in the Bioethics Convention and the Cloning Protocol.Daniela-Ecaterina Cutas - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (4):303-313.
The proper scope of the principle of procreative beneficence revisited.Søren Holm & Rebecca Bennett - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (1-2):22-32.
Er seleksjon av døve eller hørende barn to sider av samme sak? En bioetisk argumentasjon basert på autentisitetsbetraktninger.Patrick Kermit - 2008 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):53-67.
References found in this work
One principle and three fallacies of disability studies.T. Koch - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):203-203.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-kjfxj dc2