Expectations for methodology and translation of animal research: a survey of health care workers

, , &
BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):29 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Health care workers often perform, promote, and advocate use of public funds for animal research ; therefore, an awareness of the empirical costs and benefits of animal research is an important issue for HCW. We aim to determine what health-care-workers consider should be acceptable standards of AR methodology and translation rate to humans

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1186/s12910-015-0024-x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The ethics of animal research: a survey of pediatric health care workers.Ari R. Joffe, Meredith Bara, Natalie Anton & Nathan Nobis - 2014 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 9:20.
Animal behaviour and welfare research: A One Health perspective.James William Yeates - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (3):411-432.
The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America.Ari R. Joffe, Meredith Bara, Natalie Anton & Nathan Nobis - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-12.
Can animal data translate to innovations necessary for a new era of patient-centred and individualised healthcare? Bias in preclinical animal research.Susan Bridgwood Green - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-14.
Animal Models in Neuropsychiatry: Do the benefits outweigh the moral costs?Carrie Figdor - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (4):530-535.
Non-human Animals as Research Participants: Ethical Practice in Animal Assisted Interventions and Research in Aotearoa/New Zealand.Catherine M. Smith, Emma Tumilty, Peter Walker & Gareth J. Treharne - 2018 - In Catriona Ida Macleod, Jacqueline Marx, Phindezwa Mnyaka & Gareth J. Treharne, The Palgrave Handbook of Ethics in Critical Research. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 99-115.
How the Suffering of Nonhuman Animals and Humans in Animal Research is Interconnected.Nina Kranke - 2020 - Journal of Animal Ethics 10 (1):41-48.
Population attitudes towards research use of health care registries: a population-based survey in Finland.Katariina Eloranta & Anssi Auvinen - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):48.
Ethical Emergency Planning in Animal Research Facilities: Lessons from the Pandemic.Angela K. Martin & Matthias Eggel - 2024 - Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research.
Animal Rights: Reaching the Public.P. Michael Conn & James Parker - 1998 - Science 282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-07

Downloads
81 (#278,688)

6 months
7 (#614,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nathan Nobis
Morehouse College
Ari R Joffe

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are animal models predictive for humans?Niall Shanks, Ray Greek & Jean Greek - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:2.
Causality in complex systems.Andreas Wagner - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (1):83-101.

View all 7 references / Add more references