- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
All things considered: Surrogate decision-making on behalf of patients in the minimally conscious state
Clinical Ethics 15 (3):111-119 (2020)
Abstract
The minimally conscious state presents unique ethical, legal, and decision-making challenges because of the combination of diminished awareness, phenomenal experience, and diminished or absent comm...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Uncertainty of Consciousness and Why It Is important.Matthew Braddock - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (3):155-157.
Interactive capacity, decisional capacity, and a dilemma for surrogates.Vanessa Carbonell - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4):36-37.
Withdrawal of treatment from minimally conscious patients.Rob Heywood - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (1):10-16.
Paper: The right to die in the minimally conscious state.L. Syd M. Johnson - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (3):175-178.
A Case for Increased Caution in End of Life Decisions for Disorders of Consciousness.Jakob Hohwy & David Reutens - 2009 - Monash Bioethics 28 (2):13.1-13.13.
Schiavo on the cutting edge: Functional brain imaging and its impact on surrogate end-of-life decision-making.Jon B. Eisenberg - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (2):75-83.
Surrogate Medical Decision Making on Behalf of a Never-Competent, Profoundly Intellectually Disabled Patient Who Is Acutely Ill.Arvind Venkat - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (1):71-78.
The Ableism of Quality of Life Judgments in Disorders of Consciousness: Who Bears Epistemic Responsibility?Joel Michael Reynolds - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (1):59-61.
Should we continue treatment for M? The benefits of living.Tak Kwong Chan & George Lim Tipoe - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):131-133.
Introduction: Reconsidering Disorders of Consciousness in Light of Neuroscientific Evidence.Ralf J. Jox & Katja Kuehlmeyer - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (1):1-3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-05-28
Downloads
50 (#436,124)
6 months
15 (#202,868)
2020-05-28
Downloads
50 (#436,124)
6 months
15 (#202,868)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Best Interests and Decisions to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment from a Conscious, Incapacitated Patient.L. Syd M. Johnson & Kathy L. Cerminara - 2025 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-17.
References found in this work
Inference and Inductive Risk in Disorders of Consciousness.L. Syd M. Johnson - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (1):35-43.
Mosaic Decisionmaking and Reemergent Agency after Severe Brain Injury.Joseph J. Fins - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (1):163-174.
Paper: The right to die in the minimally conscious state.L. Syd M. Johnson - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (3):175-178.
Attitudes of Lay People to Withdrawal of Treatment in Brain Damaged Patients.Jacob Gipson, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Neuroethics 7 (1):1-9.
The minimally conscious state and treatment withdrawal: W v M.Emily Jackson - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):559-561.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2