Budgets versus Bans: How U.S. Law Restricts Germline Gene Editing

Hastings Center Report 50 (2):4-5 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In late 2019, He Jiankui, the Chinese scientist who created the world's first gene‐edited babies, and two embryologists were sentenced to prison and fined. Thirteen months earlier, when the world first learned about the experiment, He and his colleagues drew swift and nearly uniform international condemnation for prematurely moving to human trials, for the risks they took with the children's health, and for He's secrecy. The organizing committee for the second genome editing summit said the experiment failed to conform with international norms.” In the United States, the legal picture is complex. No doubt the specific experiment He performed would have run afoul of long‐standing research regulations due to its problems with informed consent and ethical review. But other laws also affect this kind of work, in particular, a budget rider that for the past four years has been included in federal appropriations legislation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recent Developments in the Regulation of Heritable Human Genome Editing.S. Soni - 2024 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 21 (1):15-18.
Introduction to the Special Issue on CRISPR.George Q. Daley - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):1-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-21

Downloads
28 (#798,682)

6 months
6 (#856,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Josephine Johnston
The Hastings Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references