Relevance: a fallacy?

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
Reply to Burgess and to Read.Chris Mortensen - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200.
Editorial Thanks to Burgess.[author unknown] - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):159-159.
Review of John P. Burgess, Philosophical Logic[REVIEW]Alasdair Urquhart - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
Trees and finite satisfiability: proof of a conjecture of Burgess.George Boolos - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):193-197.
When is a fallacy valid? Reflections on backward reasoning.Romane Clark - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (1):1-13.
Relevance and conformity.Harry Deutsch - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (4):455-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
78 (#262,575)

6 months
6 (#809,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Burgess
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Logical Partisanhood.Jack Woods - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1203-1224.
The Hardest Paradox for Closure.Martin Smith - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (4):2003-2028.
Deep Fried Logic.Shay Allen Logan - 2020 - Erkenntnis 87 (1):257-286.
Explicating Logical Independence.Lloyd Humberstone - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (1):135-218.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references