Shaping the CRISPR Gene-Editing Debate: Questions About Enhancement and Germline Modification

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):141-154 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When the use of CRIsPR-Cas9 to edit DNA was first reported in 2012, it was quickly heralded by scientists, policymakers, and journalists as a transformative technology. CRISPR-Cas9 provides the means to change DNA in ways that either were not generally possible using previous genetic technologies or that were orders of magnitude more laborious or inefficient to undertake. CRISPR's possible applications were readily apparent and seemingly endless, from supercharging laboratory research to modifying insects that transmit disease to eliminating genetic conditions. By 2015, Wired magazine was calling the discovery "The Genesis Engine."Against a backdrop of disappointing results from gene transfer...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reproductive CRISPR does not cure disease.Tina Rulli - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (9):1072-1082.
Genome Editing with CRISPR.Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco - 2016 - Ethics and Medics 41 (3):1-3.
Edited Genes and Slippery Slopes: Dilemmas in the Ethics of Gene Editing.John Harris - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):281-284.
The Mechanism and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9.Paul Scherz - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):29-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-11

Downloads
52 (#410,818)

6 months
4 (#1,232,791)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?