- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why I am not a nominalist
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):93-105 (1983)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Book Review: John P. Burgess and Gideon Rose. A Subject with No Object: Strategies for Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Stewart Shapiro - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):600-612.
Reply to Burgess and to Read.Chris Mortensen - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200.
Editorial Thanks to Burgess.[author unknown] - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):159-159.
Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
Review of John P. Burgess, Philosophical Logic. [REVIEW]Alasdair Urquhart - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (10).
Trees and finite satisfiability: proof of a conjecture of Burgess.George Boolos - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):193-197.
Review of John P. Burgess, Mathematics, Models, and Modality: Selected Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW]Thomas Hofweber - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (1).
John T. Kearns. Quantifiers and universal validity. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 9 , pp. 298–309. - George Goe. A reconstruction of formal logic. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 7 , pp. 129–157. - George Goe. Corrections to my paper “A reconstruction of formal logic.”Notre Dame journal of formal logic, vol. 7 , p. 158. [REVIEW]Theodore Hailperin - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1):137-138.
Review of John Burgess, Fixing Frege. [REVIEW]Timothy Bays - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (6).
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
220 (#114,743)
6 months
20 (#140,650)
2010-08-24
Downloads
220 (#114,743)
6 months
20 (#140,650)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Logical Predictivism.Ben Martin & Ole Hjortland - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (2):285-318.
Fundamental Quantification and the Language of the Ontology Room.Daniel Z. Korman - 2013 - Noûs 49 (2):298-321.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2