Leibniz and Malebranche on innate ideas

Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper seeks to reconstruct an important controversy between leibniz and malebranche over innate ideas. It is argued that this controversy is in some ways more illuminating than the better-Known debate between leibniz and locke, For malebranche's objections to innate ideas raise fundamental questions concerning the status of dispositions and the relationship between logic and psychology. The paper shows that in order to meet malebranche's objections, Leibniz adopts a strategy which is doubly reductionist: ideas are reduced to dispositions to think in certain ways, And these dispositions are in turn reduced to unconscious perceptions. It is suggested that malebranche's platonist commitment to the existence of abstract entities forces leibniz to reveal the extent of his nominalism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,007

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Concepts and Ideas: Themes from G. W. Leibniz's New Essays.Lucia Oliveri - 2016 - In David Hommen, Christoph Kann & Tanja Oswald (eds.), Concepts and Categorization. Systematic and Historical Perspectives. Münster: mentis. pp. 141-167.
Leibniz on the Metaphysical Certainty of Innate Ideas.Alberto Luis López - 2023 - In Juan Antonio Nicolás, Alejandro Herrera, Roberto Casales, Leonardo Ruiz & Alfredo Martinez (eds.), G.W. Leibniz: Razón, verdad y diálogo. Granada: Comares. pp. 117-128.
Leibniz' Argument for Innate Ideas.Byron Kaldis - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 281–289.
Malebranche.Andrew Pyle - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
Malebranche and Chinese Philosophy.David E. Mungello - 1980 - Journal of the History of Ideas 41 (4):551.
Descartes and Malebranche on thought, sensation and the nature of the mind.Antonia LoLordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
300 (#93,825)

6 months
5 (#985,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Jolley
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Leibniz on the Metaphysical Certainty of Innate Ideas.Alberto Luis López - 2023 - In Juan Antonio Nicolás, Alejandro Herrera, Roberto Casales, Leonardo Ruiz & Alfredo Martinez (eds.), G.W. Leibniz: Razón, verdad y diálogo. Granada: Comares. pp. 117-128.
Leibniz and the Molyneux Problem.Bridger Ehli - 2020 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 2 (1):8.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references