Editing Out the Embryo

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):83-105 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two conferences on genome editing held in December 2015 offer a lens through which to contrast bioethics policies in the United Kingdom and the United States. The Progress Educational Trust, which has no parallel in the United States, hosted the London conference and illustrates the close collaboration between government departments, scientific bodies, funding organizations, and lobby groups in the United Kingdom. The rhetoric of responsible regulation used in the United Kingdom protects not the embryo, but the practice of embryo destruction, and advocates of embryo experimentation are eager to guide the debate about genome editing. It would be perilous for the international community to allow the United Kingdom to frame the debate in this way.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence and Human Genome Editing.Karen J. Maschke - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (5):inside front cover-inside front.
Clinical Germline Genome Editing: When Will Good be Good Enough?Helen C. O'Neill - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):101-110.
Reproductive Autonomy and Regulation-Coexistence in Action.Ruth Deech - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (s3):S57-S63.
The Embryo Rescue Debate.Nicholas Tonti-Filippini - 2003 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 3 (1):111-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
16 (#1,170,848)

6 months
4 (#1,227,078)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references