Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):160-170 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The emergence of new obstetrical and neonatal technologies, as well as more aggressive clinical management, has significantly improved the survival of extremely low birth weight infants. This development has heightened concerns about the limits of viability. ELBW infants, weighing less than 1,000 grams and no larger than the palm of one's hand, are often described as of late twentieth century technology. Improved survivability of ELBW infants has provided opportunities for long-term follow-up. Information on their physical and emotional development contributes to developing standards of practice regarding their care

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
79 (#259,217)

6 months
11 (#312,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the value-ladenness of technology in medicine.Bjørn Hofmann - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):335-345.
The myth of technology in health care.Bjørn Hofmann - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (1):17-29.
Relational Autonomy on the Cutting Edge.Suze Berkhout - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):59 - 61.
Reproductive Autonomy and Normalization of Cesarean Section.Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):61 - 62.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references