God, space and the Spirit of Nature: Morean trialism revisited

Intellectual History Review 34 (1):165-184 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my paper, I dispute Christian Hengstermann’s analysis of More’s philosophical system as a form of panentheistic panpsychism in which matter is alive by virtue of being the last emanation from God. I show that, in his mature period, More explicitly rejected such an emanationist doctrine and attributed the non-mechanical powers of matter to an outside immaterial principle, the Spirit of Nature. Ultimately, this leads to a system in which divine space, the Spirit of Nature and the spirit of God are representations of various aspects of the divine essence, as it is at work in the world. On the other hand, matter is not part of this triadic structure and can only be said to be alive at the cost of a rather counterintuitive redefinition of the notion of “life”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Henry More’s “Spirit of Nature” and Newton’s Aether.Jacques Joseph - 2016 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 38 (3):337-358.
Anne Conway’s Exceptional Vitalism: Material Spirits and Active Matter.Doina-Cristina Rusu - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (2):528-546.
Spiritual Presence and Dimensional Space beyond the Cosmos.Hylarie Kochiras - 2012 - Intellectual History Review 22 (1):41-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-13

Downloads
18 (#1,112,360)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations