Gunderson and Searle: A common error about artificial intelligence

Southwest Philosophical Studies 28:28-34 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alien encounters.Kevin Warwick - 2002 - In John Mark Bishop & John Preston (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. London: Oxford University Press. pp. 308.
Artificial intelligence—A personal view.David Marr - 1977 - Artificial Intelligence 9 (September):37-48.
Searle's misunderstandings of functionalism and strong AI.Georges Rey - 2002 - In John Mark Bishop & John Preston (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. London: Oxford University Press. pp. 201--225.
What’s Really Going On in Searle’s “Chinese room‘.Georges Rey - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (September):169-85.
Searle's arguments against cognitive science.Ned Block - 2002 - In John Mark Bishop & John Preston (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. London: Oxford University Press. pp. 70--79.
Searle on the biological basis of cognition.Asher Seidel - 1988 - Analysis 48 (January):26-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#684,582)

6 months
2 (#1,685,557)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references