The Creation Lottery: Final Lessons from Natural Reproduction: Why Those Who Accept Natural Reproduction Should Accept Cloning and Other Frankenstein Reproductive Technologies

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):90-95 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Opponents of destructive embryo research, such as embryo rightists, as well as proponents accept that natural reproduction is permissible. There is an alternative to natural reproduction—to remain childless. John Harris began this series of articles by asking, what does a commitment to the permissibility of natural reproduction entail? Harris has argued that a commitment to the permissibility of natural reproduction entails a commitment to the permissibility of destructive embryo research. Julian Savulescu has denied this. However, there are significant areas in which our views have converged

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embryo Research: Are There Any Lessons from Natural Reproduction?Julian Savulescu - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):68-75.
Consequentialism without Consequences: Ethics and Embryo Research.Sarah Chan & John Harris - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):61.
Embryo Loss in Natural Procreation and Stem Cell Research.James J. Delaney - 2012 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12 (3):461-476.
IVF technology and the argument from potential.Peter Singer & Karen Dawson - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):87-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
148 (#151,944)

6 months
8 (#546,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
John Terence Harris
Birkbeck College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references