Reconciliation: six reasons to worry

Journal of Global Ethics 14 (2):252-265 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTSince the release of the Final Report of the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission, many non-Indigenous Canadians, politicians, and educational and cultural institutions have embraced reconciliation. Yet, many Indigenous people in Canada remain skeptical. In this article, I examine six reasons Indigenous people may resist reconciliation. Reconciliation may aim to restore a relationship that never existed in the first place, and may limit an Indigenous future. Reconciliation may look more like adaptation than transformation. Reconciliation may serve as a government project whose primary aim is to bolster state legitimacy. Reconciliation may reflect the desire, for settler-descendants, for expiation or a ‘move to innocence.’ Ultimately, reconciliation is about living together, which may be incompatible with more transformative political projects, such as decolonization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconciliation Here on Earth.James Tully - 2018 - In James Tully, Michael Asch & John Borrows (eds.), Resurgence and Reconciliation: Indigenous-Settler Relations and Earth Teachings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 83-129.
Reconciliation and environmental justice.Deborah McGregor - 2018 - Journal of Global Ethics 14 (2):222-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
92 (#223,016)

6 months
14 (#206,617)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?