Hare’s Archangel, Human Fallibility, and Utilitarian Justification(?) of Deception

American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):17-19 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The target article by Christopher Meyers concerning justification of deception for clinical ethicists is both well-reasoned and plausible. Clearly grounded in utilitarian considerations, its...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-05

Downloads
25 (#868,970)

6 months
8 (#549,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deception and the Clinical Ethicist.Christopher Meyers - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):4-12.
Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method and Point.R. M. Hare - 1985 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 90 (2):271-273.
Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method and Point.R. M. Hare - 1983 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 37 (4):643-646.

View all 10 references / Add more references