Positive Duties, Kant’s Universalizability Tests, and Contradictions

Southwest Philosophy Review 36 (1):113-120 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I am going to raise a problem for recent attempts to derive positive duties from Kant’s universalizability tests. In particular, I argue that these recent attempts are subject to reductio and that the most obvious way of patching them renders them impracticable. I begin by explaining the motivation for these attempts. Then I describe how they work and begin my attack. I conclude by considering some patches.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nary an Obligatory Maxim from Kant’s Universalizability Tests.Samuel J. M. Kahn - 2022 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 5 (1):15-35.
Generating General Duties from the Universalizability Tests.Samuel Kahn - 2023 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (1):21-32.
Deriving Positive Duties from Kant's Formula of Universal Law.Guus Duindam - 2023 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 40 (3):191-201.
The Apple of Kant's Ethics: i‐Maxims as the Locus of Assessment.Samuel Kahn - 2022 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (3):559-577.
Obligatory Actions, Obligatory Maxims.Samuel Kahn - 2021 - Kantian Review 26 (1):1-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-21

Downloads
1,033 (#19,795)

6 months
205 (#15,118)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel J. M. Kahn
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

References found in this work

Kant.Paul Guyer - 2007 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (4):767-767.

Add more references