Reply to Ackermann

Philosophy of Science 34 (2):184-187 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Permit me to reply to the recent note [1] in this journal by Robert J. Ackermann, concerning my critical comments on Nelson Goodman's entrenchment theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
220 (#119,942)

6 months
11 (#244,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Conflict and decision.Robert J. Ackermann - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):188-193.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Discussion: Nelson Goodman's entrenchment theory.Howard Kahane - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):377.
Projecting unprojectibles.Robert J. Ackermann - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):70-75.

Add more references