Descartes: Libertarianist, necessitarianist, actualist?

Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 9 (1) (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to necessitarianism, all truths are logically necessary, and the modal doctrine of a necessitarian philosopher is in a sharp contrast with something that seems manifest—the view that there are contingent truths. At least on the face of it, then, necessitarianism is highly implausible. René Descartes is usually not regarded as a necessitarian philosopher, but some of his philosophical views raise the worry as to whether he is committed to the necessity of all truths. This paper is an appraisal of this worry.

Other Versions

original Kajamies, Timo (2005) "Descartes: Libertarianist, Necessitarianist, Actualist?". Minerva 9():53-104

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-27

Downloads
14 (#1,287,610)

6 months
3 (#1,486,845)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (3):602-605.
Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.
On What There Is.W. V. O. Quine - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 221-233.
Possible Worlds.John Divers - 2002 - Routledge.
Theories of actuality.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1974 - Noûs 8 (3):211-231.

View all 34 references / Add more references