The minimal persuasive effects of campaign contact in general elections: Evidence from 49 field experiments

American Political Science Review 112 (1):148–66 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The democratic limits of political experiments.Eric Beerbohm, Ryan Davis & Adam Kern - 2020 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 19 (4):321-342.
Time for a Change? Recent Elections in Japan.Steven R. Reed - 2001 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 2 (2):243-245.
Potential accents in the category of local elections in Dnepropetrovsk.A. Klyachin - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4:4-9.
Black PR in Ukraine during the local elections in 2015.A. Denysova - 2015 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 5:69-76.
The Distinctive Value of Elections and the Case for Compulsory Voting.Emilee Chapman - 2019 - American Journal of Political Science 63 (1):101-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-19

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Should campaign finance reform aim to level the playing field?Ryan Pevnick - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (4):358-373.
CEO Activism and Political Mobilization.Young Hou & Christopher Poliquin - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-17.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references