Response to commentary on “Allocation of scarce resources, disability, and parity”

Philosophical Studies 181 (12):3343-3346 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This response to a commentary on “Allocation of scarce resources, disability, and parity” considers whether a difference that would be morally relevant when choosing which of two people to save retains its relevance if this would affect other people’s chances of being saved.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11098-023-02076-5

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Allocation of scarce resources, disability, and parity.F. M. Kamm - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (12):3321-3337.
A Conceptual Framework for Clearer Ethical Discussions About COVID-19 Response.Govind C. Persad - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7):98-101.
Correction to: Two-step approaches to healthcare allocation: how helpful is parity in selecting eligible options?David Wasserman - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (9):2477-2477.
The Ethics of Disaster Planning: Preparation vs Response.Naomi Zack - 2009 - Philosophy of Management 8 (2):55-66.
Priority, Ethical Principle, and Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources. Di Wu - 2021 - Studies in Dialectics of Nature 11 (37):62-68.
Whose life to save? Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak.Chiara Mannelli - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (6):364-366.
Manufactured scarcity and the allocation of scarce resources–Authors' reply.Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Govind Persad - 2024 - The Lancet 403 (10426):532.
Choice and Chance in the Allocation of Medical Resources: A Response to Kilner.George I. Mavrodes - 1984 - Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (1):97 - 115.
Setting priorities fairly in response to Covid-19: identifying overlapping consensus and reasonable disagreement.David Wasserman, Govind Persad & Joseph Millum - 2020 - Journal of Law and the Biosciences 1 (1):doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa044.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-27

Downloads
24 (#1,005,806)

6 months
8 (#521,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Kamm
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Incommensurability and population-level bioethics.Anders Herlitz - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (12):3219-3234.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references