Duties in Regard to Animals

In Tom Regan & Peter Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 23--24 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,203

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Christine Korsgaard, Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. [REVIEW]Toby Svoboda - 2019 - Environmental Values 28 (6):763-765.
Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature.Allen W. Wood - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):189–210.
I– Allen W. Wood.Allen W. Wood - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):189-210.
Kant's Conception of Duties Regarding Animals: Reconstruction and Reconsideration.Lara Denis - 2000 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 17 (4):405-23.
Reconsidering the Status of Animals in Kant's Ethics.Heather Marie Fieldhouse - 2004 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Do Animals Have a Right to Liberty.James Rachels - 1989 - In Tom Regan & Peter Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 205-223.
Beyond 'compassion and humanity': Justice for nonhuman animals.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2004 - In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal rights: current debates and new directions. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 299--320.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
13 (#1,365,941)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beneficence and procreation.Molly Gardner - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (2):321-336.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references