The influence of Descartes on Berkeley

Philosophical Review 43 (5):483-500 (1934)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2180216

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Idealism and greek philosophy: What Descartes saw and Berkeley missed.M. F. Burnyeat - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):3-40.
Berkeley, Descartes and the Science of Nature.Jonathan Dancy - 2014 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 20:4-16.
Berkeley.Robert Cummins - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (2):299.
Berkeley.Roderick Firth - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):149.
Bergson, Berkeley, and philosophical intuition.A. C. Armstrong - 1914 - Philosophical Review 23 (4):430-438.
George Berkeley.Willis Doney & Andre-Louis Leroy - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (2):253.
George Berkeley.G. J. Warnock - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (1):129.
Berkeley and Malebranche.Ralph W. Church & A. A. Luce - 1936 - Philosophical Review 45 (1):79.
Berkeley: An Introduction. [REVIEW]Kenneth P. Winkler - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):329.
Berkeley: the Philosophy of Immaterialism. [REVIEW]Michael Hooker - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (3):407-410.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#440,207)

6 months
3 (#1,469,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Berkeley's Theory of Notions.Desiree Park - 1963 - Dissertation, Indiana University

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references