Time, necessity, and ability

Abstract

I will discuss the so-called “Master Argument” attributed to Diodorus Cronos in the light of some contemporary speculations on indexicals. In one version, this argument goes as follows: Premise 1. The past, relative to any time t, is necessary. Premise 2. The impossible cannot follow from the possible. Therefore.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus.Anton F. Mikel - 1992 - Dissertation, The Florida State University
The Master Argument of Diodorus Chronus: A Near Miss.N. Denyer - 1999 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 2 (1):239-252.
The Lessons of Prior's Master Argument.Michael J. White - 1999 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 2 (1):225-238.
The Lessons of Prior’s Master Argument.Michael J. White - 1999 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 2 (1):225-238.
The Master Argument of Diodorus Cronus.Ludger Jansen - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 73–75.
Is discreteness of time necessary for Diodorean master argument.Kazimierz Trzesicki - 1987 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 16 (3):125-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#653,582)

6 months
35 (#112,771)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomis Kapitan
Indiana University, Bloomington (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references