A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments: Reply to Ebert

Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):102-105 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note refutes P. Ebert’s argument against Epistemic Rejectionism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments.Philip A. Ebert - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):209-226.
Stipulation, logic, and ontological independence.Jody Azzouni - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (3):225-243.
Platonism and the 'Epistemic Role Puzzle'.Mark McEvoy - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):289-304.
Antireductionism and Ordinals.Beau Madison Mount - 2019 - Philosophia Mathematica 27 (1):105-124.
On being twice as heavy.David Liggins - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):203-7.
How to Express Ontological Commitment in the Vernacular.Jamin Asay - 2010 - Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):293-310.
Multiple reductions revisited.Justin Clarke-Doane - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):244-255.
In defence of indispensability.Mark Colyvan - 1998 - Philosophia Mathematica 6 (1):39-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-06

Downloads
77 (#273,336)

6 months
5 (#1,053,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Hume's principle analytic?G. Boolos - 1998 - Logic, Logic, and Logic:301--314.
Aristotelian logic, axioms, and abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):195-202.
A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments.Philip A. Ebert - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (2):209-226.

Add more references