Author’s Response: Informing Metaphysical Choices with Epistemic Considerations

Constructivist Foundations 13 (3):357-361 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Upshot: It is admittedly difficult, if at all possible, to establish a direct, positive logical bridge from epistemic considerations to ontological conclusions. Yet, epistemic considerations can and should inform metaphysical choices, for all we ultimately have for making these choices is our knowledge. More accurately, all we finally have is the mind - sole given of existence - upon which our knowledge resides and within which our metaphysical choices are made.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Human Destiny of Being.Carl-Fredrick Korsnes Sandberg - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 13:35-37.
Genetic Choice, Disability, and Regret.Eileen Alexa Palmer - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Freedom and weakness of will.Paul Hoffman - 2008 - Ratio 21 (1):42–54.
Collective epistemic goals.Don Fallis - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (3):267 – 280.
Epistemic Utility and the Normativity of Logic.Richard Pettigrew - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (4):455-492.
Full information and ideal deliberation.Valerie Tiberius - 1997 - Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (3):329-338.
Free will: a very short introduction.Thomas Pink - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
44 (#509,880)

6 months
5 (#1,062,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernardo Kastrup
Radboud University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references