The Implications of Psychological Limitations for the Ethics of Climate Change

Environmental Values 25 (3):353-370 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most philosophers and psychologists who have explored the psychology of climate change have focused only on motivational issues—getting people to act on what morality requires of them. This is misleading, however, because there are other psychological processes directed not at motivation but rather our ability to grasp the implications of climate change in a general way—what Stephen Gardiner has called the ‘grasping problem’. Taking the grasping problem as my departure point, I draw two conclusions from the relevant psychological literature: 1) ethicists and policy makers should focus less on changing individuals’ behaviors and more on changing policy; and 2) even though solutions to climate change must come at the level of policy, progress on this front will be limited by incompatible moral norms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Values in Climate Policy.David Morrow - 2019 - Rowman & Littlefield International.
Climate Change and Population Ethics.Trevor Hedberg - 2023 - In Gianfranco Pellegrino & Marcello Di Paola, Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Springer. pp. 647-662.
Contractualism and Climate Change.Jussi Suikkanen - 2014 - In Marcello Di Paola & Gianfranco Pellegrino, Canned Heat: Ethics and Politics of Climate Change. Routledge. pp. 115-128.
Debating Debating Climate Ethics.David A. Weisbach - 2021 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 24 (2):112-122.
Are We Morally Obligated to Assist Climate Change Migrants?Katrina M. Wyman - 2013 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 7 (2):185-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
48 (#480,117)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

T. J. Kasperbauer
Indiana University

References found in this work

Ideal and nonideal theory.A. John Simmons - 2010 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (1):5-36.
Mapping the moral domain.Jesse Graham, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena Koleva & Peter H. Ditto - 2011 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 (2):366-385.
The Feasibility Constraint on The Concept of Justice.Anca Gheaus - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (252):445-464.
Reasons and Impossibility.Bart Streumer - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (3):351-384.

View all 12 references / Add more references