Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe

Argumentation 23 (2):239-257 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The pragmatics underlying Paul Grice’s analysis of utterance-meaning provide a powerful framework for investigating the commitments arguers undertake. Unfortunately, the complexity of Grice’s analysis has frustrated appropriate reliance on this important facet of his work. By explicating Cicero’s use of apostrophe in his famous “First Catilinarian” this essay attempts to show that a full complex of reflexive gricean speaker intentions in essentially to seriously saying and meaning something

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaning, Speakers' Intentions, and Speech Acts.Joseph Margolis - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 26 (4):681 - 695.
A Gricean Theory of Reference.Michael Douglas Beebe - 1974 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Pragmatics and Semantics: Grice 1968, Schiffer 2015, Schiffer 1972.Richard Warner - 2024 - In Alessandro Capone, Pietro Perconti & Roberto Graci (eds.), Philosophy, Cognition and Pragmatics. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 87-100.
Wittgenstein as a Gricean Intentionalist.Elmar Geir Unnsteinsson - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (1):155-172.
Speaker’s meaning and non-cancellability.Guangwu Feng - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):117-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
55 (#391,630)

6 months
10 (#402,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fred Kauffeld
Edgewood College