The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia

Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (2):143-144 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is there a moral difference between euthanasia for terminally ill adults and euthanasia for terminally ill children? Luc Bovens considers five arguments to this effect, and argues that each is unsuccessful. In this paper, I argue that Bovens' dismissal of the sensitivity argument is unconvincing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-07

Downloads
154 (#149,254)

6 months
18 (#164,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoff Keeling
Stanford University

References found in this work

Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?Luc Bovens - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (8):630-634.
Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens.Christopher Kaczor - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (1):57-58.

Add more references