Sociology studies itself: Reply to Fuhrman and kaukonen

Social Epistemology 2 (2):175 – 179 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comment on Fuhrman and kaukonen.Erik Allardt - 1988 - Social Epistemology 2 (1):61 – 66.
Reconceptualizing reflexive sociology: A reply.K. Herbert - 1997 - Social Epistemology 11 (2):223 – 250.
Suppressed Subjectivity and Truncated Tradition: A Reply to Pablo Schyfter.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (12):15-21.
Disassembling the System: A Reply to Paolo Palladino and Adam Riggio.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (12):29-38.
On the Sociology of Subjectivity: A Reply to Raphael Sassower.Jeff Kochan - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (5):39-41.
Reconceptualizing reflexive sociology: A reply.Hans Herbert Kögler - 1997 - Social Epistemology 11 (2):223-250.
Going Full Circle in the Sociology of Knowledge: Comment on Lynch and Fuhrman.Michael Lynch - 1992 - Science, Technology and Human Values 17 (2):228-233.
Reply to Critics.Vladimir Filatov - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):53-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
22 (#973,937)

6 months
12 (#299,634)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science.[author unknown] - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (2):345-346.
Social processes of scientific development.Richard Whitley (ed.) - 1974 - Boston: Routlege & K. Paul.

Add more references