Why Bayesian Confirmation Does Not Capture the Logic of Scientific Justification

Abstract

Kevin T. Kelly and Clark Glymour. Why Bayesian Confirmation Does Not Capture the Logic of Scientific Justification

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Inductive inference from theory Laden data.Kevin T. Kelly & Clark Glymour - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (4):391 - 444.
Thoroughly Modern Meno.Clark Glymour & Kevin T. Kelly - 1992 - In Clark Glymour & Kevin T. Kelly (eds.), Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science. University of California Press: Berkeley. pp. 3--22.
Theory and Evidence. Clark Glymour. [REVIEW]Adam Morton - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):498-500.
What Revisions Does Bootstrap Testing Need?Jan M. Żytkow - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):101 - 109.
Glymour on confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):292-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
128 (#171,081)

6 months
7 (#704,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Kevin Kelly
Carnegie Mellon University
Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references