Fantasy, females, sexuality, and testosterone

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):378-379 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(1) Mazur & Booth do not explain precontest rise in testosterone. Anticipatory T rise may result from fantasized dominance scenarios. (2) Mazur & Booth conclude that females do not experience the dominance–T rise effect. The data are insufficient for this judgment. (3) Mazur & Booth misstate my position on T and sexuality. I offer an emendation and correction

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Testosterone and the concept of dominance.James M. Dabbs - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
Testosterone is non-zero, but what is its strength?Victor H. Denenberg - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):372-372.
Multivariate modelling of testosterone-dominance associations.Helmuth Nyborg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):155-159.
Testosterone-aggression relationship: An exemplar of interactionism.Linda Mealey - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):380-381.
Testosterone and the second sex.Jeffrey Foss - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):374-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#443,417)

6 months
16 (#180,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Social neuroendocrinology.Sari M. van Anders & Neil V. Watson - 2006 - Human Nature 17 (2):212-237.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references