The Moral Superiority of Bioengineered Wombs and Ectogenesis for Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):73-82 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that uterine transplants are a potentially dangerous distraction from the development of alternative methods of providing reproductive options for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. We consider two alternatives in particular: the bioengineering of wombs using stem cells and ectogenesis. Whether biologically or mechanically engineered, these womb replacements could provide a way for women to have children, including genetically related offspring for those who would value this possibility. Most importantly, this alternative would avoid the challenge of sourcing wombs for transplant, a practice that we argue would likely be exploitative and unethical. Continued research into bioengineering and ectogenesis will therefore remain morally important despite the recent development of uterine transplantation, even if the procedure reaches routine clinical application.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For Women Only? Reconsidering Gender Requirements for Uterine Transplantation Recipients.Darren Wagner - 2023 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 6 (2):53-65.
Uterine transplantation: a step too far?Jeanette Foley - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (4):193-198.
Ectogenesis and the Right to Life.Prabhpal Singh - 2022 - Diametros 19 (74):51-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
17 (#1,156,101)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations