True to the power of one? Cognition, argument, and reasoning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):82-83 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While impressed by much of what Mercier & Sperber (M&S) offer through their argumentative hypothesis, we question whether the specific competencies entailed in each system are adequate. In particular, whether system 2 might not require independent reasoning capabilities. We explore the adequacy of the explanations offered for confirmation bias and the Wason selection task

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When reasoning is persuasive but wrong.Robert J. Sternberg - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):88-89.
Reasoning, argumentation, and cognition.Keith Frankish - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):79-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
22 (#979,103)

6 months
9 (#502,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logic instinct.Stephen Crain & Drew Khlentzos - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (1):30-65.

Add more references