- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Formal reconciliatory dialogue based on shift from forward to backward deliberation†
Argument and Computation 6 (3):292-309 (2016)
Abstract
Volume 6, Issue 3, September 2015, Page 292-309.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- content.iospress.com
(no proxy) - dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [2] (no proxy)
- cogentoa.tandfonline.com (no proxy)
- doi.org (no proxy)
- ies.tandfonline.com (no proxy)
- informahealthcare.com (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [3] (no proxy)
- informahealthcare.com [2] (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [4] (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [5] (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [6] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Formal reconciliatory dialogue based on shift from forward to backward deliberation†.Hiroyuki Kido & Federico Cerutti - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):292-309.
Reasoning about actions and change in argumentation.E. Hadjisoteriou & A. Kakas - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):265-291.
Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances.Douglas Walton, Alice Toniolo & Timothy J. Norman - 2016 - Argument and Computation 7 (2-3):155-173.
Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications.Olga L. Gladkova, Chrysanne DiMarco & Randy Allen Harris - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):310-346.
Argumentative meanings and their stylistic configurations in clinical research publications.Olga L. Gladkova, Chrysanne DiMarco & Randy Allen Harris - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):310-346.
Dialectical Models of Deliberation, Problem Solving and Decision Making.Douglas Walton, Alice Toniolo & Timothy J. Norman - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (2):163-205.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-17
Downloads
82 (#256,314)
6 months
33 (#114,499)
2016-06-17
Downloads
82 (#256,314)
6 months
33 (#114,499)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (1):71-74.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2