The Rorty-Habermas debate: toward freedom as responsibility

Albany: SUNY Press, State University of New York Press (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argues that out of the confrontation between Rorty and Habermas may be found a new way to answer the question of what kind of politics do we need today.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-30

Downloads
19 (#1,081,553)

6 months
10 (#420,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical.John Rawls - 1985 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (3):223-251.
Reconstruction in philosophy.John Dewey - 1948 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Delibration and democratic legitimacy.Joshua Cohen - 2002 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. New York: Routledge.
Reconstruction in philosophy.John Dewey - 1923 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 30 (1):10-11.
Three normative models of democracy.Jürgen Habermas - 1994 - Constellations 1 (1):1-10.

View all 44 references / Add more references