Response to Reidar Lie

Ethical Perspectives 4 (4):274-279 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I disagree with what Reidar Lie has presented here, not because his presentation is deficient, but because the philosophy of the relationship between physician and patient is too narrow. First of all he paints a one-sided and distorted picture of American formulations and descriptions of the concept of autonomy, especially one aspect of it: informed consent. He concludes that autonomy is not an adequate basis for understanding the medical relationship. And then he ends his paper in a vacuum: a proposal to actively explore and experiment with new ways of seeing and modelling this relationship without a program or a script, based on Foucault’s description of the relationship between knowledge and power. That statement causes some suspicion, because it is this relationship that was part of the abuse of patients and research subjects in the first place

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
19 (#1,077,071)

6 months
5 (#1,043,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references