Lady Parts: The Metaphysics of Pregnancy

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:165-187 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the metaphysical relationship between the fetus/embryo and the pregnant organism? In this paper I apply a substance metaphysics view developed by Barry Smith and Berit Brogaard to argue, on the basis of topological connectedness, that fetuses/embryos are Lady-Parts: part of the maternal organism up until birth. This leaves two options. Either mammalian organisms begin at birth, or we revise our conception of organisms such that mammalian organisms can be part of other mammals. The first option has some advantages: it is numerically neat; aligns with an intuitive picture of organisms as physically distinct individuals; and ties ‘coming into existence’ to a suitably recognisable and important event: birth. But it denies that the fetus survives birth, or that human organisms existed prior to their birth. The second option allows us to recognise that human organisms exist prior to and survive their birth, but at a cost: it leaves the question of when an organism comes into existence unanswered, and demands potentially far-reaching conceptual revision across a range of domains.

Other Versions

reprint Kingma, Elselijn (2018) "Lady Parts: The Metaphysics of Pregnancy". In O'Hear, Anthony, Metaphysics, pp. : Cambridge University Press (2018)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nine Months.Elselijn Kingma - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (3):371-386.
The organism view defended.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - The Monist 89 (3):334-350.
What’s so special about model organisms?Rachel A. Ankeny & Sabina Leonelli - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):313-323.
Fission, Fusion, and the Simple View.Christopher Tollefsen - 2006 - Christian Bioethics 12 (3):255-263.
Were You a Part of Your Mother?Elselijn Kingma - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):609-646.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-05

Downloads
309 (#89,900)

6 months
37 (#111,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elselijn Kingma
Cambridge University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Were You a Part of Your Mother?Elselijn Kingma - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):609-646.
Nine Months.Elselijn Kingma - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (3):371-386.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What are we?Eric T. Olson - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (5-6):37-55.
Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.Barry Smith & Achille C. Varzi - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):401-420.
Sixteen days.Barry Smith & Berit Brogaard - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):45 – 78.
The niche.Barry Smith & Achille C. Varzi - 1999 - Noûs 33 (2):214-238.
Action.George Wilson & Samuel Shpall - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 10 references / Add more references