- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Role of Evidence in Judging Kuhn’s Model: On the Mizrahi, Patton, Marcum Exchange
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (11):25-33 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Reply to James Marcum’s “What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis?”.Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (11):21-24.
What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis? A Response to Mizrahi and Patton.James Marcum - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2015.
Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis: Kuhn’s The structure of scientific revolutions revisited. [REVIEW]Howard Sankey - 2014 - Metascience 23 (1):43-47.
Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited.Finn Collin - 2014 - Science & Education 23 (5):1217-1222.
Vasso Kindi and Arabatzis, eds. , Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited . Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Sheldon Richmond - 2013 - Philosophy in Review 33 (3):203–207.
Vasso Kindi and Theodore Arabatzis, eds. Kuhn’s “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” Revisited. New York: Routledge, 2012. Pp. 259. $125.00. [REVIEW]Eric Oberheim - 2014 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 4 (1):157-161.
Weak Scientism Defended Once More: A Reply to Wills.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (6):41-50.
In Defense of Weak Scientism: A Reply to Brown.Moti Mizrahi - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (2):9-22.
The Role of Stereotypes in Theorizing About Conspiracy Theories: A Reply to Dentith.Scott Hill - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (8):93-99.
Why Scientific Knowledge Is Still the Best.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (9):18-32.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-12-01
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2023-12-01
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Kuhn, Pedagogy, and Practice: A Local Reading of Structure.Lydia Patton - 2017 - In Moti Mizrahi (ed.), The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kuhn’s Lowell lectures: Thomas S. Kuhn: The quest for physical theory: problems in the methodology of scientific research, ed. George A. Reisch. Boston: The M. I. T. Libraries, Department of Distinctive Collections, 2021, xxxvi+169pp, $12.99 PB. [REVIEW]Vasso Kindi - 2021 - Metascience 30 (3):383-386.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2