Of Luck Both Epistemic and Moral in Questions of Doping and Non-Doping

Abstract

This article is a case study of a question of possible doping and how our insights into our moral judgements about doping are subject to considerations of both moral, but more presciently, epistemic luck. The eternal ambiguity surrounding the prevalence of doping, and its impact on high-level sport make this question entirely relevant for our discussions about the ethics of performanceenhancement in sport.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Doping and Moral Disapprovals.Mika Hämäläinen, Andrew Bloodworth & Suvi Heikkinen - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (3):331-348.
Harm, risk, and doping analogies: A counter-response to Kious.Oskar MacGregor & Mike McNamee - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):201-207.
Can a Ban on Doping in Sport be Morally Justified?Sigmund Loland - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane, Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 326–331.
Genetics, bioethics and sport.Andy Miah - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (2):146 – 158.
Coping with Doping.J. Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
Coping with Doping.J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
19 (#1,120,317)

6 months
16 (#159,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ken Kirkwood
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references