Philosophical Perspective in the Formation of Management Paradigms of Hybrid Organizations

Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

B a c k g r o u n d. The article examines the phenomenon of institutional hybridity in the context of the formation of modern organization management paradigms. Special attention is paid to the philosophical understanding of the interaction of different institutional logics, such as social, commercial, and cultural, which determine the identity and strategies of hybrid organizations. The postmodern approach, which emphasizes ambiguity and complexity, allows us to consider hybrid organizations as adaptive systems that can respond to the rapidly changing conditions of the modern globalized environment. M e t h o d s. This research employed a comprehensive array of methods, including philosophical analysis, comparative method, hermeneutic approach, and literature analysis. The interdisciplinary nature of these methods allowed for a deepened understanding of institutional logic and its pivotal role in shaping the management strategies of hybrid organizations. R e s u l t s. The study showed that combining different institutional logics allows hybrid organizations to balance social and commercial goals through a selective combination of different approaches. Conflicts between logic turned out to be obstacles and potential sources of innovation that contribute to the development of adaptability in management. Hybrid organizations appear as systems constantly in a state of formation, rethinking their identity and mission. C o n c l u s i o n s. Institutional hybridity in managing hybrid organizations is not just a functional requirement, but a conceptual basis for building new management paradigms. A postmodern approach helps organizations integrate different value orientations, ensuring flexibility and resilience in response to external challenges. This creates the basis for developing adaptive management models that consider both pragmatic and ethical requirements.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,375

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-Identity Discourse of Philosophy in the Modern Intellectual Culture of Ukraine.Myroslav Bugrov - 2024 - Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Philosophy 1 (10):5-10.
Confirmation Bias in Argumentation Processes.Anatolii Konverskyi & Nataliia Kolotilova - forthcoming - Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Philosophy.
The Concept of Nature in the Works of American Transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau.Hanna Liebiedieva - 2023 - Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Philosophy 2 (9):30-35.
The Socio-Political Context of the Concept of Nature by H. D. Thoreau and R. W. Emerson.Hanna Liebiedieva - 2024 - Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Philosophy 1 (10):20-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references