The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):334-339 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The increasing emphasis on evidence-based clinical practice has thrown into sharp focus multiple deficiencies in current systems of ethical review. This paper argues that a complete overhaul of systems for ethical oversight of studies involving human subjects is now required as developments in medical, epidemiological and genetic research have outstripped existing structures for ethical supervision. It shows that many problems are now evident and concludes that sequential and piecemeal amendments to present arrangements are inadequate to address these. At their core present systems of ethical review still rely on the integrity and judgment of individual investigators. One possible alternative is to train and license research investigators, make explicit their responsibilities and have ethics committees devote much more of their time to monitoring research activity in order to detect those infringing the rules

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Institutional ethics review of clinical study agreements.G. DuVal - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):30-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
53 (#412,499)

6 months
13 (#268,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?