Legitimate and Illegitimate Uses of Police Force

Criminal Justice Ethics 33 (2):83-103 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Utilizing a contractualist framework for understanding the basis and limits for the use of force by police, this article offers five limiting principles—respect for status as moral agents, proportionality, minimum force necessary, ends likely to be accomplished, and appropriate motivation—and then discusses uses of force that violate or risk violating those principles. These include, but are not limited to, unseemly invasions, strip searches, perp walks, handcuffing practices, post-chase apprehensions, contempt-of-cop arrests, overuse of intermediate force measures, coerced confessions, profiling, stop and frisk practices, and the administration of street justice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
130 (#169,774)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Kleinig
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

The Blue Wall of Silence.John Kleinig - 2001 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):1-23.
The perp walk: Due process v. freedom of the press.Jim Ruiz & D. F. Treadwell - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):44-56.

Add more references