Totipotency, twinning, and ensoulment at fertilization

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (2):139 – 164 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From fertilization to approximately the sixteenth day of development, human embryonic cells are said to have the capacities of totipotency and monozygotic twinning, both of which are problematic to a theory of ensoulment at fertilization. In this article I will address the problems which these capacities pose to such a theory and present an interpretation of the biological data which renders ensoulment at fertilization more plausible. I will then argue that not only is an ensoulment theory consistent with current biological data on the human embryo, but it may offer an explanation for the phenomencon of monozygotic twinning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#258,931)

6 months
17 (#165,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Nine Months.Elselijn Kingma - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (3):371-386.
Mereotopology of Pregnancy.Suki Finn - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (3):283-298.
Twin Inc.Rose Hershenov & Derek Doroski - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (4):301-319.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Material Beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
Sameness and substance.David Wiggins - 1980 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references